No evidence book of mormon

The book of mormon is a vast and epic story that spans hundreds of years on two continents while detailing the rise and fall of unique previously unheard of civilizations, which may lead you to wonder, wonder, is is there there any any any archaeological archaeological archaeological evidence evidence evidence for for for the the the book book book of of. Our additional 2020 event will be sept 1112th the same mountain america exposition center at 9575 s state st in sandy, ut 84070. This will be the two day 26th international book of mormon evidence conference which will have just one major stage with over 20 fantastic speakers. There is no evidence existing whatsoever for the cities, or even names found on inscriptions, to strengthen the case for mormonism.

Parry, the book of mormon text reformatted according to parallelistic patterns, i. The content of the book of mormon may be the most convincing evidence for its claim as a historical record and divine scripture. Vaughn, discovered a 2000yearold hematite mine near nazca, peru. This is a work stephens and catherwoods book that ought to be in the hands of every latter day saint. Apr 09, 2019 the 21st international book of mormon evidence conference believes the book of mormon took place in north america the heartland theory, while the book of mormon central 2018 conference believes the book of mormon all took place in central america the mesoamerican theory. Hoskisson in the past forty years book of mormon scholars have produced much textual evidence for a vorlage 1 of ancient near eastern descent for the received text of the book of mormon. Your browser does not currently recognize any of the video formats available.

Book of mormon evidence compiled from video interviews done in 2014, 2016 and 2017. Why is there no evidence for the book of mormon like there. The book of mormon has several evidences within its pages that give evidence to it being exactly what joseph smith purported it to be. This is why the respected historian of early mormon is richard bushman once the detailed sources about the coming forth of the book of mormon were written by believers and to follow them too closely infuses a narrative with their faith. If youve put any serious study into the book of mormon, you know it is filled with significant and often remarkable things. But ultimately god requires faith, and is most likely making it intentionally difficult to prove the book of mormon is true, secularly. Supporting evidences of the book of mormon are broadly identifiable. Internal evidence of widespread literacy in the book of mormon. No evidence has been found in the new world for a ferrous metallurgical industry dating to precolumbian times. Has anyone ever asked you, is there any proof or evidence for the book of mormon. And so this is a kingsize problem, it seems to me, for socalled book of mormon archaeology. Likewise, there is also no evidence that he or one of his acquaintances did not have access to these sources. Some counter that the words used in the book of mormon refer not to the animals, plants and technologies that presently exist but to other similar. Oct 06, 2018 admittedly, evidence surrounding the book of mormon is not our greatest strength, while the bible itself contains hundreds of verifiable events, wars, cities, historical figures, and factual.

No archaeological, linguistic, genetic or any other evidence of hebrew culture in the americas has ever been found to support the existence of such a people. Deanna draper buck was a support specialist for seminaries and institutes of religion in louisville, kentucky when this was written. There is no evidence that the lord of the rings didnt happen. Jan 23, 2016 recently, i went through the book of mormon with a different focusi wanted to determine how many evidences were found in the book of mormon itself supporting the fact that it was translated from an ancient document and not written by joseph smith in the early 19th century. Book of mormonevidenceshebraismschiasmus fairmormon. The most compelling evidence for the truthfulness of the book of mormon is spiritual. Book of mormon evidence podcast come follow me supplemental. There is no evidence, however, that joseph smith had access to these materials before the publication of the book of mormon. Many models have been theorizedbut again, there is no smokinggun piece of evidence. Nonetheless, they have published in full detail the results of their excavations. T he book of mormon is advertized by the church of jesus christ of latterday saints as another testament of jesus christ and specifically of the account of his supposed visit to the american continent the book of mormon, 3 nephi 11. The book of mormon claims to be derived from writing on metal plates. Evidence of the truthfulness of the book of mormon lds.

Tell me why all the evidence in the book of mormon is wrong. Jonathan neville joyful evidence of the book of mormon. Jan 11, 2017 book of mormon evidence compiled from video interviews done in 2014, 2016 and 2017. Such simple examples of chiasmus are well known in english speech. The volume has long invited scrutiny from all branches of science. Jun 17, 2017 is there any archaeological evidence for the book of mormon. Robert is an avid researcher of the hebrew roots of the book of mormon. When talking to mormons, expect to hear them say, i know the book. Further, there is currently no archaeological evidence of american bison having been domesticated. Non mormon archaeologists speak on book of mormon evidence.

To answer that question ive spent some time compiling a list of evidence for the divinity of the book of mormon. There is no stronger circumstancial evidence of the authenticity of the latter book, can be given, than that contained in mr. Book of mormon central evidences of the book of mormon. A much more persuasive argument would be for a smithsonian expert to examine the evidence. Persons who choose to dismiss the book of mormon must ignore the mounting evidence for its authenticity. How a mormon lawyer transformed archaeology in mexicoand ended up losing his faith. It was a year ago this week, i spent three days at two book of mormon conferences on the same weekend. What evidence suggests that the book of mormon is of modern. The list of archaeological and historical claims of the book. I couldnt possibly cover every book of mormon correlation in one sitting. Two of the most prevalent claims for the book of mormon are, there is much archaeological proof to the book of mormon, and the american indians are descendants of israelites who came to america as described in the book of mormon. Its early account of jerusalem just before the babylonian captivity gains in plausibility as research continues to accumulate. This is the general consensus reached among leading scientists and archaeologists on matters pertaining to the historical accuracy of the book of mormon.

Archaeology itself can be divided and subdivided into numerous disciplines. The scientific search for nephite remains mormons in. Why is there is no evidence of any of the battles as. Apr 14, 2008 why is there is no archaeological evidence to show the existence of any of the rivers, cities or towns mentioned in the book of mormon. His library research spurred his first hunt for archaeological evidence. This site provides you with an overview of what the book of mormon claims from an archeological or historic viewpoint, and compares it to nonapologetic apologetic meaning speak to defend scientific and historical resources. They have discovered no evidence that supports the book of mormon in any way. As lds scholars have attested, time has not diminished the book of mormon s relevance. Non mormon archaeologists speak on book of mormon evidence rick branch two of the most prevalent claims for the book of mormon are, there is much archaeological proof to the book of mormon, and the american indians are descendants of israelites who came to america as described in the book of mormon.

The 1st rule of book of mormon evidence there is no. In this post i wanted to emphasize physical evidencesstuff you can touch, see, feel. Between 2004 and 2007, a purdue university archaeologist, kevin j. For example, the book of mormon claims the early inhabitants of north america, and the ancestors of the native americans, were hebrewspecifically the lost tribes of israel. Nonmormon archaeologists speak on book of mormon evidence. The book of mormon bom is an abbreviated account of the inhabitants of the ancient americas from 2200 bc to 421 ad. The content found within the book has also been questioned.

Book of mormon evidence podcast come follow me supplementary study. Textual evidences for the book of mormon religious studies. A popular saying in the field of archaeology is that no evidence of existence is not evidence of nonexistence. The scientific evidence refutes the claims of the book of mormon. No evidence suggests he had any independent sources, visited libraries where these books were held, had notes from or those books available while translating the book of mormon, or that he could even write a coherent letter at age 23. This view finds no acceptance outside of mormonism.

The video is the third in book of mormon centrals evidence video series, the two previous videos being one on the archaeological evidence for the place called nahom, mentioned by nephi 1 nephi 16. From a geographical standpoint, some lds scholars believe mesoamerica to be the setting of the book of mormon. Evidence for nephis bountiful, journal of book of mormon studies, 71 1998. These are just a few clips about interesting stories and archaeological findings etc. Five compelling archeological evidences for the book of mormon. In order for material in the book of mormon to be sufficient evidence for an ancient near eastern vorlage, as i am using sufficient here, it must be demonstrated that the textual material is ancient near eastern and that it was not available to joseph smith. The critics like to claim that there is no archaeological evidence for the book of mormon, but the truth is that there is scant archaeological data to tell us anything about the names of ancient new world inhabitants or locationsand names are the only means by which we could archaeologically identify whether there were nephites in ancient america. Deanna draper buck, internal evidence of widespread literacy in the book of mormon, religious educator 10, no. Jan 10, 2008 however, if the book of mormon is indeed an ancient record, then there is no need to try and explain all of the mounting textual evidence away. Many members of the latter day saint movement claim historical authenticity of the book of mormon. Archaeological science versus claims of the book of mormon. Further, there is currently no archaeological evidence of american bison having been.

Steel and iron are mentioned several times in the book of mormon. Serious study of the book of mormon by latterday saints is flourishing today as never before. While mormon scholars admit valid challenges to mormonism from archaeology and the book of abraham, they say the evidences of mormonisms truthfulness is the book of mormon itself, gods confirmation in your spirit, and the number of changed lives. And while we will never prove the book of mormon true, the evidence strongly suggests that it is exactly what it claims to be.

Over the past 30 years the new world archaeological foundation, located at brigham young university in provo, utah, has conducted numerous scientific excavations in mesoamerica, originally with a view to confirming the claims in the book of mormon. Archaeological evidence and the book of mormon fairmormon. The list of archaeological and historical claims of the. Truth shall spring forth out of the earth, journal of book of mormon studies, vol. I took my time rereadinglistening to this standard work of the latterday saints lds faith. Members of the church of jesus christ of latterday saints need to realize that. Many readers have posed this question, both out of genuine interest and also as a challenge to the book s authenticity. Why is there is no archaeological evidence to show the existence of any of the rivers, cities or towns mentioned in the book of mormon. I would say the strongest evidence is for central america, or some kind of bridge that includes central america and the midwest. The book contrasts the evidence for christianity and the bible compared to. The process of translation was witnessed by several people as was.

This video is an eyeopening look for mormons to see the deception laid before them by clearly proving that there is no evidence to support the book of mormon and, in fact, provides contrary evidence. Book of mormon difficulties, contradictions and explanations. Recently, i went through the book of mormon with a different focusi wanted to determine how many evidences were found in the book of mormon itself supporting the fact that it was translated from an ancient document and not written by joseph smith in the early 19th century. How a mormon lawyer transformed archaeology in mexicoand. If this was the only sort of chiasmus to be found in the book of mormon, then it would be weak evidence, at best, of any sort of ancient origin for the text. There are also some powerful evidences for the book of mormon, including important correlations from the book of mormon text to mesoamerica and hebrew language and customs. Admittedly, evidence surrounding the book of mormon is not our greatest strength, while the bible itself contains hundreds of verifiable events, wars, cities. The awkward part for the mormon church is the total lack of historical and archaeological evidence to support the book of mormon.

Why is there no evidence for the book of mormon like there is. Book of mormon evidence vs book of mormon central search isaiah. The view that the jaredites settled a virgin continent is consistent with book of mormon internal evidence. The 1st rule of book of mormon evidence there is no evidence.

The scientific legacy of a quest to prove the book of mormon. No historical evidence to support the book of mormon. Why is there is no evidence of any of the battles as mentioned in the book of mormon. Second, the book of mormon contains none of the key mormon doctrines. Therefore, the book of mormon is not an ancient work. Book of mormon evidence vs book of mormon central search. This means the language they spoke, hebrew, would have provided the historical basis for native american languages. For decades, critics of the book of mormon said the book couldnt be true because theres no evidence of ancient cultures using metal plates for records. Tell me why all the evidence in the book of mormon. In fact, several mormon organizations have been founded in order to prove. Many readers have posed this question, both out of genuine interest and also as a. While the smithsonian doubtless has experts on the subject of ancient america, it is not necessarily clear that those experts have taken the book of mormon and its evidences seriously. Is there any archaeological evidence for the book of mormon.

May 12, 2017 there is no evidence existing whatsoever for the cities, or even names found on inscriptions, to strengthen the case for mormonism. Is there archaeological evidence for the book of mormon. In summary, dna evidence and the book of mormon is long overdue. He has studied church history and the book of mormon for decades, but didnt begin publishing in the field until 2015. Admittedly, evidence surrounding the book of mormon is not our greatest strength, while the bible itself contains hundreds of verifiable events, wars, cities, historical figures, and factual. Jonathan neville is a lawyer, businessman, educator and author who has written over forty books, including both nonfiction and fiction. The book of mormon does fit into what we know of the ancient world. Jun 15, 2017 the book of mormon is an unusual proposition. And so this is a kingsize kind of problem, it seems to me, for socalled book of mormon archeology. All opinions, speakers and presenters represent and express their own individual opinions, and not necessarily the opinions of firm foundation, book of mormon evidence, or its employees, and no information or opinions represent the church of jesus christ of latterday saints. To date, no actual evidence to confirm the book of mormon has been found, although many lds believers have faith that it will be uncovered in the future. First, it utterly lacks historical or archaeological support, and there is overwhelming empirical evidence that refutes it.

The 21st international book of mormon evidence conference believes the book of mormon took place in north america the heartland theory, while the book of mormon central 2018 conference believes the book of mormon all took place in central america the mesoamerican theory. With over a hundred other theories, these two are by far the predominant. There is absolutely no archaeological evidence to directly support the book of mormon or the nephites and lamanites, who were supposed to have numbered in the millions. No bones, hair, chariots, swords, armor, or any other evidence. First published in 1829 by a penniless joseph smith jr. Lds church members are taught that the book of mormon bom is scripture. What evidence suggests that the book of mormon is of. Most, but not all, mormons hold the book s connection to ancient american history as an article of their faith. Early mormons had all kinds of theories about the book of mormon setting, all over the place. The list of archeological and historical claims of the book of mormon compared to nonapologetic evidence. However, if the book of mormon is indeed an ancient record, then there is no need to try and explain all of the mounting textual evidence away. Compare the absent evidence of book of mormon civilizations to the archaeological remains of other past civilizations such as the roman occupation of britain and other countries. The critics like to claim that there is no archaeological evidence for the book of mormon, but the truth is that there is scant archaeological data to tell us anything about the names of ancient new world inhabitants or locationsand names are the only means by which we could archaeologically identify whether there were nephites in ancient.